So what is the difference between the two you might wonder?

Reactive Maintenance

Reactive maintenance describes the strategy of repairing elements or instrumentality solely when the quality has de-escalated or been run to the purpose of failure.

Reactive maintenance is appealing as a result of it offers the most utilization and successively maximum production output, of the quality by exploitation it to its limits.

 This strategy is merely helpful, however, up till the purpose wherever the quality fails.

The cost of repairing the quality when failure will doubtless be quite the assembly price received by running it to failure.

Furthermore, as elements begin to vibrate, overheat, and break, further machine injury will occur, doubtless leading to additional expensive repairs.

When organizations utilize a reactive maintenance strategy, they usually fall victim to treating the quality symptom, instead of the matter inflicting the symptom.

For example, your maintenance team is also repeatedly repairing associate degree hot bearing that would be prevented if the team was gazing the quality as an entire instead of simply that specialize in the one symptom.

Maintenance work, like replacement and repairing elements and conjugation instrumentality, will be an oversized money burden to the organization.

This could be prevented by treating the matter instead of the symptom.

To sum it up, it is financially better to have a great Preventative Maintenance plan in place. The cost of replacing your HVAC unit can be thousands of dollars.

Though even with the best Preventative Maintenance plan there can be emergencies that arise, that is why having a perfect blend of Preventative and Reactive is the best option.

Enviro USA has trained technicians across North America to help with your Preventative and Reactive Maintenance.

Call 866-564-1414 or visit Enviro USA’s website to set up a Zoom meeting at www.envirousa.com

“Building Care Made Easy”